The Bharal – formerly known as Blue Sheep – is a goat-like caprid. It is designed for living in precipitous and rocky terrain and may well be one of the most abundant mountain ungulates, maybe second only to the chamois. 
Bhutia (Sikkimese-Tibetan language): Nao 
Chinese: 岩羊, Yanyang 
English: Greater Blue Sheep, Chinese Blue Sheep, Himalayan Blue Sheep, Tibetan Blue Sheep 
French: Bharal de l’Himalaya 
German: Bharal , Blauschaf 
Nepali: Nervati , Nahur 
Hindi: Bharal, Bharar, Bharut 
Ladakhi: Na, Sna (female), Napo (male) 
Spanish: Capra azul del Himalaya 
Bharal is the technically correct common name of Hindi origin, while „Blue Sheep“, as the animal is often inappropriately called (see Bunch et al. 2009), is a reference to the bluish sheen in the coat. Nayaur appears to stem from the Nepali word nahur – a native name for this species. Pseudes and ois are Greek words, meaning false and sheep respectively. 
Other (putative )scientific names
Ovis nahura 
Taxonomy / similar species
Pseudois nayaur Hodgson, 1833 
The evolutionary relationships between Bharal, true sheep and true goats are unclear, but the general assumption is that the genus originated from common ancestral goat stock in the early Pliocene (Thenius and Hofer, 1960).  Thus the genus is more closely related to goats (Capra sp.) than to sheep (Ovis sp.). Pseudois nayaur will hybridize with domestic goats but not with domestic sheep. 
Although the Greater Bharal is larger in body, horn, and skull measurements than the Dwarf Bharal (Pseudois schaeferi), there is only a weak genetic difference between the two species.  Some authors treat the Dwarf Bharal as a subspecies (Pseudois nayaur schaeferi) of the Greater Bharal (Pseudois nayaur nayaur). Monotypic. 
Subspecies: Other authors [1, 2, 12] also distinguish between Himalayan Bharal (P. n. nayaur) and Chinese Bharal (P. n. szechuanensis). They quote a slightly smaller size and lighter colour for the Chinese Bharal, further smaller horn length and circumference, but greater tip-to-tip-length. Boundaries between Himalayan and Chinese Bharal seem to be unclear.  Furthermore a small population in Ningxia (synonymous with Helan Mountains?) is believed to belong to a third subspecies of P. nayaur. 
This species is found in Bhutan, China (Gansu, South Inner Mongolia , Ningxia-Inner Mongolia border, Qinghai, Shaanxi , Sichuan, Tibet, south-eastern Xinjiang Uyghur Autonomous Region, and northern Yunnan), northern India, northern Myanmar (Rabinowitz and Tun Khaing 1998), Nepal, and northern Pakistan. 
China: Its distribution runs from western Tibet, southwestern Xinjiang (Schaller et al. 1987) where there are small populations in the mountains bordering the western edge of Aru Co, extending eastwards with in scattered populations throughout the autonomous region. It also occurs in southern Xinjiang, along the Kunlun Mountains and in the Arjin Mountains. It is present in most mountain ranges of western and southern Qinghai into eastern Sichuan and northwestern Yunnan, as well as in the Qilian and associated ranges of Gansu. The eastern extent of its current distribution appears to be in the Helan Shan, which form the western border of Ningxia Hui Autonomous Region (with Inner Mongolia).
Bhutan: It is found throughout northern Bhutan above 4.000 to 4.500 m asl.
India: Blue Sheep are fairly continuously distributed in the northern Himalayan and Trans-Himalayan regions of India, although the extent of its eastern distribution along the northern border of Arunachal Pradesh is still unknown. They are relatively common in many areas of eastern Ladakh (Jammu and Kashmir), and in parts of Spiti and the upper Parbati valley in northern Himachal Pradesh (Fox et al. 1986, S. Pandey pers. comm.). Blue Sheep are known to occur in the Govind Pashu Vihar Wildlife Sanctuary and Nanda Devi National Park, and near Badrinath (Uttar Pradesh), on the slopes of the Khangchendzonga massif (Sikkim), and in eastern Arunachal Pradesh. Very recently, Blue Sheep presence has been confirmed in the northwestern corner of Arunachal Pradesh near its border with Bhutan and China.
Nepal: It is fairly continuously distributed to the north of the Greater Himalaya from the border with India and Tibet in the extreme northwest, eastwards through Dolpo and Mustang to Gorkha district in north-central Nepal. It then re-occurs in Nepal in at least two isolated areas: in Lamobogar, and on the southwestern slopes of Kanchenjunga near the border with Sikkim (India) (Schaller 1977, Wegge 1991). These two are probably connected with more extensive populations across the border in Tibet.
Pakistan: Its main distribution range in Pakistan includes the upper Gujerab valley, the upper Shimshal valley, and the area eastward from Shimshal pass (District Gilgit), including part of Khunjerab National Park (Schaller 1976; Roberts 1977; Rasool 1986; Wegge 1988, 1989; G. Tallone in litt. 1993). Outside these areas there is a single, recent observation of one animal from Khunjerab pass (R. Hess pers. obs. 1985). Earlier, Roberts (1977) mentioned its occurrence (with proof) around Shigar and the Baltoro glacier (District Baltistan), however, we have no actual information from this area. Roberts’ (1977) source for its occurrence in the Passu valley was a quote from Lydekker (1907) who mentioned “Hunza valley, near Passu”, but possibly meaning the Shimshal valley. The presence of the species in the Passu valley is not confirmed (D. Mallon pers. obs. in litt.).
Tajikistan?: Grubb (2005) indicates that Blue Sheep can be found in Tajikistan, but documentation for this is not provided, and recent surveys of the Pamir area have failed to mention find evidence of occurrence in Tajikistan (Magomedov et al. 2003, Schaller 2005), or neighboring regions of Taxkorgan County in Xinjiang, China (Schaller 2005) or Afghanistan (Schaller 2003). Maps of the species‘ distribution can be found in Shackleton (1997) and Schaller (1998). 
general appearance: The Bharal is stockily built, stout-legged and broad-chested, designed for living in precipitous and rocky terrain. The rather short legs lower the center of gravity and reduce heat loss. 
sheep and goat features: Bharal are sheep-like in the absence of a beard, any goat-like smell or calluses on the knees. Bharals do not possess, or have only rudimentary traces of, the ovis-typical glands, like inguinal glands (groin), preorbital glands (infront of eyes) and interdigital glands (between the digits). . On the other side they resemble goats in having a broad, flat tail that is naked underneath, large dew claws and markings on the front limbs , as well as some skull features typical of goats. 
length / head-body: 120-140 cm; Males are over 30 per cent larger than females. 
shoulder height: 80-91,4 cm (males) 
weight: 60-75 kg (males), 35-55 kg (females) 
horn length: 38-76 cm (males), 10-20 cm (females) 
tail: 10 to 20 cm long , broad and flat with a bare central surface 
dewclaws: large 
karyotype: 2n = 54; one specimen from Gansu Province, China, had 56 
longevity: 12-15 years in zoos , in the wild, animals older than 10 years are rarely encountered. A zoo animal died with 203/4 years. 
Colouration / pelage
overall body colour in winter: bluish-grey ; brown-grey with a bluish cast 
overall body colour in summer: brownish-grey 
front of neck and chest: black , lacking in females 
underparts: white  occasionally golden-brown ; a black stripe along the lower side of flank separates the body colour from the underside. The flank stripe is continuous with the black of the front of the hindlegs.  The flank stripe is more conspicuous in males and appears at age 4.  In females it is more grey instead of black. 
legs: The inside and back of limbs are white, fronts of all four legs are black ; sometimes black strips extend down the whole hindleg. 
head: dark-brown face-mask 
rump patch: white 
tail: black ; two thirds black, underside naked 
Horns of males grow outward, then backward, and curve downward with the tips usually pointing slightly upward.  They are rounded  or more precisely roughly triangular in cross-section and show a ridge on the inner margin . The surface is daintily wrinkled . They resemble vaguely those of the Daghestan Tur. [2, 5] Horns initially show backward-pointing tips, then, from about 10 years of age in adult males, curving around in a semicircle.  Annual grooves are conspicuous. 
horns of young: Newborns do not show any horn edges. Horns start to develop after some weeks and reach 0,5 cm after two months. A male had 6 cm long horns after six months; and 10 cm long horns after 9 months. 
horn length – in males: 38-76 cm , 82 cm ; – females: 10-20 cm 
tip-to-tip-spread: 57-82 cm (males) ; 59,6-73,4 cm 
horn basal girth: 23-34 cm 
basal diameter of horn core: greater 8 cm, usually greater 9 cm 
Bharals occupy a variety of habitats across the region  with highly variable annual precipitation.  They inhabit open grassy slopes in high mountains from 2.500-5.500 m asl. Bharals are usually found near cliffs and similar escape cover, and generally avoid entering forests (Schaller 1977; the Helan Shan [see below] is a partial exception). This species is often able to maintain locally high densities in habitats otherwise inhospitable to other wild species. Often, these areas are close to domestic livestock (although generally at higher elevations, or in less productive habitats). They are very tolerant of environmental extremes from desert mountains in searing heat to windy and cold slopes (Schaller 1998).  Nevertheless Bharals choose better habitat if available.
Habitats differ from area to area :
In Xizang, China, they occur at 4.000-4.900 m in alpine sedge meadows and areas free of tall vegetation near talus or rough, precipitous terrain, and also in much lower, arid, hilly terrain.
In the Helan Mountains, China, an isolated desert mountain range in Inner Mongolia, Northern China, Bharals occur at 2.000-3.000 m in montane grasslands, woodland steppe, conifer forest, subalpine shrubland and meadows and had a preference for montane woodland steppe. In one protected study area of the Helan Shan availability of grass species in the genus Stipa probably most influenced foraging habitat selection.
A high-quality habitat in Nepal consisted of 29 per cent bare ground and 58 per cent grass cover. 
Food and feeding
Greater Bharals can obtain food resources from sparse, high-elevation vegetation. 
In Northern China, graminoids constituted 58,8 per cent of summer diets. Winter diets consisted of 36,7 per cent graminoids and nearly 50 per cent browse, including tree leaves. In Northern Nepal, Greater Bharal diet also was dominated by graminoids (51 per cent) and forbs and brows constituted about equal proportions. 
Some plant taxa eaten by Bharal comprise: Arundinella sp., Danthonia sp., Festuca sp., Trisetum sp., Berberis, Cotoneaster, Ephedra, Lonicera, Juniperus, Poa alpina, Poa pratenis. 
Siberian Ibex: The ranges of Greater Bharal and Siberian Ibex (Capra sibirica) are sympatric in some areas. 
Tibetan Argali: In Ladakh, India, Greater Bharal and Tibetan Argali (Ovis hodgsoni) were spatially segregated due to habitat preferences and did not compete for forage. 
Livestock: Bharals also often share foraging areas with livestock, especially during summer. There can be substantial diet overlap with livestock, which can have a strong influence on the availability of forage. In Xizang, there was spatial overlap with livestock during summer and diet and habitat separation during winter. In another study the increased intake of browse by Greater Bharal in winter was due to the limited availability of graminoids because of their consumption by livestock in summer.
Sheep and goats: Greater Blue Sheep and domestic goats had the most similar diets, but differed in the proportions of the three forage classes consumed. In Diet and spatial overlap in one study was lowest between Bharals and domestic sheep and goats in winter.
Yak: Greater Bharals overlapped extensively with domestic Yaks because both used similar elevations and both consumed high proportions of browse. 
Major mortality occurs in winter and spring due to climatic conditions and poor forage quality. Mortality rates of rams increases with age.
Table 1: Mortality rate of rams in different age groups 
|rams 1,5 to 4,5 years old||0 to 7,4 per cent|
|rams 5,5 to 10,5 years old||14,9 to 25 per cent|
|rams 11,5 to 15,5 years old||40,7 to 100 per cent|
Percentage of rams that survived up to 8 years old was 64,7 per cent and that of rams that survived greater than 13 years was 7,8 per cent. On the Tibetan Plateau, over 80 per cent of males died between 4 and 11 years of age and at Dorpatan in Nepal, about 50 per cent of Greater Blue Sheep died between birth and 2 years of age. 
Predators: Bharals in the Manang District of Nepal (population about 1.000 animals) were the major prey of Snow Leopards (Panthera unica), which consumed 11-24 percent of the total number of Blue sheep annually. Other mammalian predators are Grey Wolves (Canis lupus), Leopards (Panthera pardus) and Dholes (Cuon alpinus)  and Himalaya Red Fox (Vulpes vulpes montana) . But large predators have been extirpated in many areas . Eagles (Aquila sp.) may lift lambs . Matschei (2012) includes Steppe Eagle (Aquila nipalensis). 
sexual maturity: 1,5 years, though males are not fully sexually active until age 7 ; most females give birth at age three. 
breeding season: December to January [6, 15]; in one study area in Nepal: mid-December to late January, with a peak in early January 
mixed groups: Males join females to form mixed groups and actively court females with a variety of courtship displays. Dominant males, older than five years old, do most of the mating. 
activity: Rams are envolved in combats for dominance over females. They either rear up on their hind legs and, leaning forward, crash horns (goatlike) or occasionally race towards each other head-on (sheeplike). 
estrus: lasts one to four days with a peak of about 20 to 36 hours. The estrous cycle lasts about 25 days and females recycle if not impregnated. 
gestation: 160 days [6, 15]
lambing season: May to June ; most of the Tibetan Plateau: mid-June ; one study area in Nepal: commenced on 23 May and probably peaked in mid-June, but births can extend into July 
young per birth: single lambs (rarely twins) [6, 15]
weaning: after six months 
creches: larger numbers of nursing young temporarily associated with a few females, have been documented. 
active throughout the day ; Greater Bharals are diurnal and are most active before 9:30 h and after 16 h, but also feed about midday. In Nepal, during rut in December, Greater Bharal were least active during the warmest period of the day (13:30 to 15:00 h) and activity increased in late afternoon. In May to June, activity peaked later in the afternoon. 
Movements, home range and social organisation
Population parameters vary widely among areas. Greater Bharals are usually gregarious . Sentinels watch out for predators.  Bharals have a squirrel-like „chirrt“ alarm call , a warning hiss or loud sharp alarm whistle. 
group size: Bharals live in small to rather large herds (300 individuals in one herd have been observed). 
On the Tibetan Plateau, female herds averaged 14,5 individuals and mixed herds 23,2 individuals. 
In the Manang District, Nepal, mean group size was 15,6, with smaller groups in winter than other seasons probably due to lower forage abundance and quality. 
Herds in the Helan Mountains consisted of an average of 4,2 individuals in winter and 5,6 in spring and summer. 
composition of mixed herds before and during rut: In one area in Nepal, 66 per cent of males were in mixed herds before rut and 80 per cent during rut. 
densities: In the Helan Mountains region in Northern China densities ranged from 3,6 ind/km² in spring to 4,6 ind/km² in summer of the following year. In better-quality habitats in other areas of China, densities were 3,6 to 5,3 ind/km². 
home ranges: were 3 to 7 km² for males and 2,5 to 5 km² for females in winter.
sex and age group ratios: per 100 females were 93,7 males in spring, 126,9 in autumn and 91,7 in winter. The population consisted of 34 per cent adult males, 32 per cent ewes, 15 per cent yearlings, and 19 per cent lambs. Mother-young groups were most numerous in spring and male-female groups were present only in winter. Adult males and females are not always segregated in separate herds during the non-mating period. 
lamb per ewe ratios: were 52,5 per cent in spring, 70 per cent in autumn and 55,4 per cent in winter. 
Yearling per 100 ewe ratios: were 32,9 in spring, 59,9 in autumn and 38,1 in winter. 
Yearling to female ratios: on the Tibetan Plateau usually were from 26:100 to 40:100. 
The IUCN Red List classifies the Bharal as „least concern“ in view of its wide distribution, presumed large population, and because any decline is probably much less than the rate required to qualify for listing in a threatened category. 
Range-wide population estimates are unavailable. But taken together the estimates below, total population sizes could be roughly 47.000 (almost certainly a very conservative estimate) or as much as 414.000 (probably an overestimate). Bharals live almost entirely in steep, mountainous terrain. It is probably absent from broad areas devoid of steep topography (e.g., basins). However, this does not necessarily mean populations are fragmented, because it appears to be present in virtually all appropriate mountainous terrain from the Qilian Mountains in the north (Gansu and Qinghai provinces) to the Himalaya in the south.  The Greater Bharal is probably the most numerous ungulate in western China. 
China: Most extrapolations of population size in China are based on insufficient justification, and should be viewed with caution. However, in marked contrast to other species, field investigations of subjective and anecdotal reports of P. nayaur invariably confirm the presence and general abundance of this species. Thus, although specific figures in Chinese literature may be inaccurate, all evidence suggests that P. nayaur is widespread and relatively abundant within appropriate habitats within Chinese portions of the Tibetan plateau.
In Western China, P. nayaur was said to be “relatively abundant” (Shackleton 1997, Wang 1998), with various (questionable) local density estimates, and a total population greater than 10.000. The bulk of these 10.000 were an extrapolation for the Arjin Shan Nature Reserve, which is probably an overestimate. However, numerous areas within the current range were not included in this estimate, so the amount of 10.000 within the western portion of the Chinese range is not necessarily out of the question (Schaller 1998 guessed that at least 10.000 inhabited the Chang Tang Nature Reserve in western Tibet). Schaller (1998) cited an estimate by Pu (1993) of 34.500-49.600 in “western Tibet”, which includes but is larger than the Chang Tang Nature Reserve.
Further east within the Tibetan plateau, Wang (1998) cited a Chinese extrapolation of over 1.200.000 in Qinghai province (of which 267.000 were in “eastern” Qinghai), which is probably a considerable overestimate. Schaller (1998), in discussing the estimate by Pu (1993, see above), noted that it is likely that greater than 20 to 30 percent of the entire Chinese population lives east of “western Tibet”. If there are 30.000 to 50.000 in “western Tibet”, there may thus be roughly from 43.000 to 62.500 (using the derivation from Pu 1993), to 200.000 to 400.000 (using extrapolations from Wang 1998) within the entire Chinese portion of the Tibetan Plateau.
In the Helan Shan (Inner Mongolia), Ren et al. (1999) and Lü et al. (2000) estimated roughly 5.000 to 9.000 Blue Sheep, but their extrapolations were based on non-randomly placed transects.  Other estimates quote even higher numbers for this area: 10.000  Liu et al. (2005) have continued to monitor this population, which, regardless of methodological problems in estimating its size, is clearly dense and in no danger. 
India: Within India, Shackleton (1997) cites an estimate produced by Fox et al. (1991) of “a minimum of 11.000” within Ladakh.
Nepal: Shackleton (1997) reports a “conservative estimate of 10.000 animals”, although Schaller (1998) included a table suggesting 1.947 to 2.561 in areas counted within Nepal. Pakistan: Shackleton writes that, “according to written reports [Wegge 1988, Rasool 1990], the species is not as rare as previously thought … the most recent estimates indicated between 2.000 and 2.500 animals in 1992.”
Bhutan: No estimate available 
Competition with livestock has been suggested and probably occurs (Shrestha et al. 2005), but in general, habitat loss due to livestock threat is minor, and P. nayaur can sustain a reasonably large population under current and likely future scenarios with regard to the livestock industry. This is because reasonably large populations of the species can be supported entirely within high elevation, steep, or excessively rough/rocky terrain that is used sparingly if at all by domestic livestock. Livestock does exist near P. nayaur subpopulations, and in specific situations there may be conflicts. However, in general, it appears that even relatively intensive livestock grazing does not prohibit healthy populations of P. nayaur. This is in marked contrast to livestock’s effect on some other wild species. 
No guns, no poaching: Bharals are hunted for food. But because access to Bharal habitat is usually difficult and individual body-size is relatively small, market-based poaching for meat appears to be rare, at least in the northern portions of the Tibetan plateau. Locally-based, subsistence poaching has occurred frequently in recent years, and no doubt continues. However, China has recently begun implementing a new policy of confiscating all guns from nomadic pastoralists, and observations during 1998 to 2002 in Gansu and Qinghai provinces corroborate this (R. Harris pers. obs.). Thus, local herders now have little technology with which to poach Bharal for meat. Within Nepal, in some areas religious beliefs protect Blue Sheep from poaching, 
Sarcoptic mange: An outbreak was reported among P. nayaur in extreme northern Pakistan, and has markedly reduced abundance locally. This may yet be a cause for concern range-wide, but similar reports from elsewhere within the species’ range have not surfaced (Woodford 2003, 2006). 
The expansion of grazing areas for domestic yaks could become a problem in Bhutan, although Bharals seem not to be in immediate danger there and numbers of Bharal increase. However, heavy grazing by both species is damaging the fragile, high alpine vegetation, so Bharal population trends may be reversed in the future. 
Localized over-hunting, including that by the army in remote outposts is a major threat in India. 
Limited range and low numbers make Blue Sheep vulnerable to poaching and habitat loss in Pakistan. When access to the Shimshal valley is opened by construction of a jeep road, the species will most probably come under increased hunting pressure.  (According to geo.tv the road into the valley opened in 2004.)
In China, Bharals are present within a number of large protected areas:
– Chang Tang Nature Reserve (Schaller and Gu 1994)
– Medoq, Qomolangma and Zayu Reserves (Tibet)
– the Arjin Mountain Reserve (Achuff and Petocz 1988, Butler et al. 1986, Gu 1990)
– and Taxkorgan Reserve (Schaller 1977; Xinjiang)
– Kekexili and Sanjiangyuan Nature Reserves in Qinghai
– Yanchiwan and Qilian Nature Reserves (western Gansu)
Some of these protected areas truly limit human disturbance, some have been demarcated where human disturbance was already quite low (generally because inhospitable climate makes production for human purposes marginal at best).
Other protected areas exist on paper only. Of note, however, is that, at least in China, Bharals appears able to persist at reasonable densities in the absence of protected areas. 
In Bhutan, Blue Sheep are known to occur in Jigme Dorji National Park. Conservation measures proposed by Wollenhaupt (1989) included, using input from local inhabitants, establishing integrated alpine forest and grassland reserves in high elevation areas where demand for domestic yak grazing is considerable and deforestation and degradation of alpine areas occur (Wollenhaupt 1989). 
In India, Blue Sheep occur in several national parks and many other protected areas in northern India (Fox 1987; Fox et al. 1986, 1991; Gaston et al. 1981, 1983; Green 1987; Pandey in prep.; Singh et al. 1990) including:
Jammu and Kashmir – Hemis National Park and Sabu Chukor Wildlife Reserve; Himachal Pradesh – Great Himalayan and Pin Valley National Parks and Chital, Daranghati, Kais, Kanawar, Lippa Asrang, Rakshum, Rupi Bhaba, Sangla Valley (includes previous Rakcha-Chitkul WS), Sechu Tuan Nala, and Tirthan (locally threatened) Wildlife Sanctuaries; Uttar Pradesh – Nanda Devi and Valley of Flowers National Parks, and Govind Pashu Vihar and Kedarnath Wildlife Sanctuaries; Sikkim – Khangchendzonga National Park; and their unlikely presence in Namdapha National Park of northeastern Arunachal Pradesh needs to be checked.
Conservation measures proposed for India:
1) Establish the proposed Changtang, Gya-Miru, Karakoram, and Lung Nag Wildlife Sanctuaries (Jammu and Kashmir), and the extensions to the Great Himalayan National Park and the proposed Srikhand National Park (Himachal Pradesh)
2) Determine if Blue Sheep occur along the northern border of Arunachal Pradesh
3) Make the control of illegal hunting of this species the primary management priority to maintain viable populations under current land use regimes
4) Monitor changes in livestock grazing practices that could affect competition with Blue Sheep 
In Nepal, Blue Sheep are found in Shey-Phoksundo National Park and in the Annapurna Conservation Area. It is the main big game species in the Dhorpatan Hunting Reserve.
Conservation measures proposed for Nepal:
1) Maintain the current, closely controlled legal hunting program
2) Consider a regulated program of sustainable, low-level subsistence hunting by local villagers in some areas.
3) Steps should be taken to halt or reverse the habitat destruction caused by livestock grazing in the Blue Sheep’s natural habitat. 
In Pakistan Khunjerab National Park contains a large portion of the country’s total population of Blue Sheep. It occurs in no other protected area.
Conservation measures proposed for Pakistan:
1) Extend the boundaries of Khunjerab National Park eastwards.
2) Address problems faced by local people whose livelihoods would be affected by this extension. The management plan originally proposed for Khunjerab National Park did not do this, but this is necessary before its conservation recommendations can be implemented. The measures taken in the Bar valley project initiated by WWF-Pakistan and similar projects could serve as useful models.
3) Determine what detrimental influences the new road to Shimshal will have in the Park’s modified management plan. 
International (“trophy”) hunting for P. nayaur occurs (or occured), but only in four to five designated areas in China, Nepal and Pakistan. 
China: P. nayaur is categorized as a Class II protected species under China’s National Wildlife Law of 1988. Generally hunting of P. nayaur is legal only via permit obtained by provincial wildlife offices. In practice, such permits are provided only for foreign trophy hunters. Thus, hunting of P. nayaur is essentially illegal in China. International hunting in China – including for Bharal – was suspended in 2006, and as of summer 2014 had not yet been re-established. 
Pakistan: The Pakistani programs are conducted in community conservancies within the Moutain Areas Conservancy Project (MACP). Six permits for the 2010/2011 season were issued by he Wildlife Department of the Province of Gilgit-Baltistan. The expansion of the Pakistani trophy-hunting programs is hampered by unresolved issues between the Khunjerab National Park administration and the communities where hunting is conducted. The number of rams taken in these programs are low and do not have any impact on population structure and development. 
Nepal: Bharal hunting programs exist in the Dhorpatan Hunting Reserve; the authorities are also contemplating opening the Kanchendzonga Wildlife Reserve (12 to 14 permits for the 2012/2013 season) as a community hunting area.
Many mammal watchers mention and value Great Bharals, especially from Ladakh, India – see trip reports. It is the most frequently seen ungulate in this region. Pfister (2004) states that the best place to see it in Ladakh is Hemis National Park.  Menon (2009) quotes that the species is best seen in India at Nanda Devi NP (Uttaranchal). 
 Castelló, José R., 2016: Bovids of the World – Antelopes, Gazelles, Cattle, Goats, Sheep, and Relatives. Princeton University Press
 Damm, Gerhard R. and Franco, Nicolás, 2014: The CIC Caprinae Atlas of the World – CIC International Council for Game and Wildlife Conservation, Budakeszi, Hungary in cooperation with Rowland Ward Publications RSA (Pty) Ltd., Johannesburg, South Africa
 Dickson, Barney; Hutton, Jonathan and Adams, Bill, 2009: Recreational hunting, conservation, and rural livelyhoods – science and practice. Blackwell Publishing, Ltd
 Groves, Colin and Grubb, Peter, 2011: Ungulate Taxonomy. The John Hopkins University Press
 Grzimek, Bernhard (Hrsg.), 1988: Grzimeks Enzyklopädie, Säugetiere, Band 5. Kindler Verlag, München
 Harris, R. B., 2014. Pseudois nayaur. The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species 2014: e.T61513537A64313015. Downloaded on 18 June 2018.
 Matschei, Christian, 2012: Böcke, Takine & Moschusochsen. Filander Verlag
 Menon, Vivek, 2009: Field guide to Indian mammals. A&C Black Publisher Ltd., London
 Pfister, Otto, 2004: Birds and Mammals of Ladakh. Oxford University Press
 Schaller, George B., 1977: Mountain Monarchs – wild sheep and goats of the Himalaya. The University of Chicago Press
 Shackleton, D. M (ed.) and the IUCN/SSC Caprinae Specialist Group, 1997: Wild Sheep and Goats and their Relatives. Status Survey and Conservation Action Plan for Caprinae. IUCN, Gland, Switzerland and Cambridge, UK. 390 + vii pp
 Smith, Andrew T. and Xie, Yan, 2008: A guide to the mammals of China. Princeton University Press
 Valdez, Raul, 1982: The wild sheep of the world. Wild Sheep and Goat International, Mesila, New Mexico 88046
 Valdez, Raul, 1985: Lords of the pinnacles – wild goats of the world. Wild Sheep and Goat International, Mesila, New Mexico 88046
 Wilson, D. E. and Mittermeier, R. A. [eds], 2011: Handbook of the mammals of the world. Vol. 2. Hoofed mammals. Lynx Edicions, Barcelona.